FTMO vs Funding Pips – Three-step Comparison

FTMO vs Funding Pips – Three-step Comparison

Welcome to our comparison between FTMO and Funding Pips, where we will compare all the major aspects of each company. We will be looking into the companies themselves as well as the three-step evaluations that both offer to traders from all across the globe.


Company Details

Company DetailsFTMOFunding Pips
Incorporation Date20152020
CEOJan KowalskiPeter Adams
Office LocationPrague, Czech RepublicLondon, UK
Scaling Plan

FTMO and Funding Pips are two reputable and trustworthy proprietary trading firms. FTMO was incorporated in 2015 while being managed by their CEO, Jan Kowalski, with offices in Prague, Czech Republic. Funding Pips, on the other hand, was incorporated in 2020 while being managed by CEO Peter Adams, with its office located in London, UK. Both firms provide scaling plans for successful traders.


Funding Program Options

Funding Program OptionsFTMOFunding Pips
One-step Evaluation
Two-step Evaluation
Three-step Evaluation
Instant Funding

FTMO provides its traders with two main evaluation paths: a two-step evaluation and a three-step evaluation, along with instant funding options for qualifying traders. Funding Pips also offers two-step and three-step evaluations, as well as instant funding programs.


Three-step Comparison

Trading Rules/ObjectivesFTMO ChallengeFTMO VerificationFunding Pips Three-step
Profit Target (Phase 1)10%5%8%
Profit Target (Phase 2)5%5%5%
Profit Target (Phase 3)5%5%5%
Maximum Daily Loss5%5%4%
Maximum Loss10% trailing10% trailing8%
Minimum Trading DaysNo MinimumNo MinimumNo Minimum
Maximum Trading PeriodStep 1: 30 days
Step 2: 30 days
Step 3: 30 days
Step 1: 30 days
Step 2: 30 days
Step 3: 30 days
Unlimited
Leverage1:301:301:50
Profit Split80%80%Up to 90%

After covering the trading objectives of each company’s three-step evaluations, let’s take a look at the account sizes and costs of these programs.


Account Size & Costs

Account SizeFTMO ChallengeFTMO VerificationFunding Pips Three-step
$10,000$155$140$60
$25,000$345$310$130
$50,000$670$620$250
$100,000$1,020$950$450
$200,000$1,990$1,850$850

FTMO provides a broad range of account sizes from $10,000 up to $200,000, while Funding Pips offers a slightly more affordable option starting from $10,000 up to $200,000 for its three-step evaluation program.


Brokers & Trading Platforms

FeatureFTMOFunding Pips
BrokerInteractive Brokers, Dukascopy, LMAXTier-1 Liquidity Provider
Trading PlatformMetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTraderMetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5

Both firms support popular trading platforms including MT4, MT5, and cTrader. FTMO allows multiple broker options, whereas Funding Pips provides trading through a tier-1 liquidity provider.


Trading Instruments

Trading InstrumentFTMOFunding Pips
Forex Pairs
Commodities
Indices
Cryptocurrencies

Both proprietary trading firms allow trading across Forex, Commodities, Indices, and Cryptocurrencies.


Community Feedback

Trustpilot StatisticsFTMOFunding Pips
Rating4.7/54.5/5
Number of Reviews8,430512
5-Star Ratings88%84%

FTMO has an excellent community rating of 4.7/5 from over 8,400 reviews. Funding Pips has a strong rating of 4.5/5 from over 500 reviews.


Conclusion

In conclusion, FTMO and Funding Pips are both top-tier choices within the proprietary trading industry.

  • FTMO is ideal for traders looking for structured three-step evaluations, multiple broker options, and high community credibility.
  • Funding Pips is more suitable for traders seeking affordable evaluation fees and flexible instant funding alongside three-step programs.

This concludes our comparison between FTMO and Funding Pips. If either of these proprietary trading firms sparked interest, we have prepared a unique discount code, which you can apply while purchasing an evaluation to make it even more affordable!

FTMO Discount Code: FTMO10
Funding Pips Discount Code: PIPS10

Our comparison between FTMO and Funding Pips was last updated on 19.10.2025 at 12:45 (IST).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *